CODE NUCLIDE ORIGINAL DATA TAKEN FROM MODIFICATION ADDITIONAL FILE MODIFICATIONS ORIGINAL DATA TAKEN FROM MODIFICATION ADDITIONAL FILE MODIFICATIONS COMMENTS
1048111 048_Cd_111 JENDL-3.3 (1,451) Updated.
(3,1) Revised.
(3,2) Revised.
(3,102) Revised.
(3,251) Deleted.
(4,2) Transformation matrix deleted.
(12,16-107) Added.
(14,16-107) Added.
(15,16-107) Added.
R was changed from 6.5fm to 6.2fm so as to reproduce measured
elemental total cross sections. In the energy region from 100 keV to 2.5 MeV, cross section
was determined from the elemental data measured by Whalen
et al./25/, Green et al./26/ and Poenitz and Whalen/12/. Background cross sections were generated so as to cancel
capture background. At the energies below 10 MeV, the cross section was modified
to well reproduce the elemental data File obtained by merging:
- Resolved Resonances (MLBW) <2.3 keV : Ref.1
- Unresolved Resonances 2.3 keV - 100 keV : JENDL-3.3
- Fast neutron region >100 keV : JENDL-3.3 Corrected interpolation in MF=5.
Reference:
1) S.F.Mughabghab: Atlas of Neutron Resonances, to be
published by Elsevier, 2006 (5-th edition of BNL-325)
JENDL-3.2 (2,151) Resolved and unresolved resonance parameters
(3,102) Renormalization to recent experiment
(3,2), (3,4), (3,51-91), (4,51-91)
Effects of renormalization of capture
File produced by WPEC Subgroup 23 in 2004-2005 The present resolved resonance evaluation is a result of a
consistent analysis of available experimental information on Cd
isotopes together with simultaneous resonance optimization of
natural-Cd transmission and capture data measured at GELINA. The
R-matrix code REFIT has been used for resonance analysis.
Resolved resonance parameters in MF=2 are REFIT (v.2008) output
parameters translated into ENDF-6 Reich-Moore format (LRU=1,LRF=3)
The code REFEND (v.July 2008) has been used for the translation
(format-conversion). The REFIT cross-sections are preserved in
ENDF provided that NJOY-compatible channel- and scattering-radius
options have been chosen by the REFIT evaluator. Conversion below
is rigorous/exact because of such compatibility.
A full description of the resolved resonance evaluation
performed at the EC-JRC-IRMM, Geel, Belgium, is given in Ref.1.
Reference: 1) S.Kopecky et al. Private Communication. The remaining part of the evaluation (above the RRR) is the
ENDF/B-VII.0 file, which description has been left below intact
(including the description of the replaced RRR evaluation in
order to be temporarily used for comparison).