CODE | NUCLIDE | ORIGINAL DATA TAKEN FROM | MODIFICATION | ADDITIONAL FILE MODIFICATIONS | ORIGINAL DATA TAKEN FROM | MODIFICATION | ADDITIONAL FILE MODIFICATIONS | COMMENTS |
1048111 | 048_Cd_111 | JENDL-3.3 | (1,451) Updated. (3,1) Revised. (3,2) Revised. (3,102) Revised. (3,251) Deleted. (4,2) Transformation matrix deleted. (12,16-107) Added. (14,16-107) Added. (15,16-107) Added. |
R was changed from 6.5fm to 6.2fm so as to reproduce measured elemental total cross sections. In the energy region from 100 keV to 2.5 MeV, cross section was determined from the elemental data measured by Whalen et al./25/, Green et al./26/ and Poenitz and Whalen/12/. Background cross sections were generated so as to cancel capture background. At the energies below 10 MeV, the cross section was modified to well reproduce the elemental data File obtained by merging: - Resolved Resonances (MLBW) <2.3 keV : Ref.1 - Unresolved Resonances 2.3 keV - 100 keV : JENDL-3.3 - Fast neutron region >100 keV : JENDL-3.3 Corrected interpolation in MF=5. Reference: 1) S.F.Mughabghab: Atlas of Neutron Resonances, to be published by Elsevier, 2006 (5-th edition of BNL-325) |
JENDL-3.2 | (2,151) Resolved and unresolved resonance parameters (3,102) Renormalization to recent experiment (3,2), (3,4), (3,51-91), (4,51-91) Effects of renormalization of capture |
File produced by WPEC Subgroup 23 in 2004-2005 The present resolved resonance evaluation is a result of a consistent analysis of available experimental information on Cd isotopes together with simultaneous resonance optimization of natural-Cd transmission and capture data measured at GELINA. The R-matrix code REFIT has been used for resonance analysis. Resolved resonance parameters in MF=2 are REFIT (v.2008) output parameters translated into ENDF-6 Reich-Moore format (LRU=1,LRF=3) The code REFEND (v.July 2008) has been used for the translation (format-conversion). The REFIT cross-sections are preserved in ENDF provided that NJOY-compatible channel- and scattering-radius options have been chosen by the REFIT evaluator. Conversion below is rigorous/exact because of such compatibility. A full description of the resolved resonance evaluation performed at the EC-JRC-IRMM, Geel, Belgium, is given in Ref.1. Reference: 1) S.Kopecky et al. Private Communication. The remaining part of the evaluation (above the RRR) is the ENDF/B-VII.0 file, which description has been left below intact (including the description of the replaced RRR evaluation in order to be temporarily used for comparison). |